fbpx
MyMBU

Third-Party Comment

School of Nursing

The Missouri Baptist University, Bachelor’s Degree in Nursing for the RN-BSN (delivered via distance education) and pre-licensure BSN and Master’s Degree in Nursing for the Family Nurse Practitioner, Executive Leadership, and Nursing Education tracks (delivered via distance education) programs are pursuing pre-accreditation candidacy status from the National League for Nursing Commission for Nursing Education Accreditation (NLN CNEA), located at 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20037; phone 202-909-2500. Interested parties are invited to submit third party comments in writing directly to NLN CNEA, attention Lesleyan Jackson (cneaaccreditation@nln.org), NLN CNEA Manager of Accreditation Services, no later than November 25, 2021

Education Division

The Missouri Baptist University Education Division is hosting an accreditation visit by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) on February 25-27, 2018. Interested parties are invited to submit third-party comments by January 12, 2018 to the site team. Please note that comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered, and should specify the party’s relationship to the provider (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates).

We invite you to submit written testimony to:

CAEP
1140 19th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
Or by email to: callforcomments@caepnet.org

Such comments must be within the specified period and based on the core tenets of CAEP accreditation standards of excellence, which recognize that:

In CAEP’s performance-based system, accreditation is based on evidence that demonstrates that teacher candidates know the subject matter and can teach it effectively so that students learn. In the CAEP system, EPPs must prove that candidates can connect theory to practice and be effective in an actual P-12 classroom.
A professional education provider that is accredited by CAEP is expected to be involved in ongoing planning and evaluation; engaged in continuous assessment and development; ensure that faculty and programs reflect new knowledge, practice, and technologies; and be involved in continuous development in response to the evolving world of education and educational reform.
Comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered, and should specify the respondent’s relationship, if any, to the institution (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates). Copies of all correspondence received will be sent to the university for comment prior to the review. No anonymous testimony will be considered.